Call it the Rishi Sunak reset week or, to borrow from The Spectator's Katy Balls, the shore-up Sunak week - the prime minister will be going into this weekend feeling the past few days have been a job well done.  He has got his flagship Rwanda bill through parliament and is promising a "regular rhythm" of flights will be getting off the ground from July.

He has also got off the ground himself, with a dash to Poland and then Germany, in a show of strength with European allies in the face of Russian aggression. As the US finally approved a $61bn military aid package for Ukraine, our prime minister announced he'd lift the UK's defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030.

That would amount to £87bn a year by the start of the 2030s, with the UK spending a cumulative extra £75bn on the military over the next six years. That of course all hinges on winning an election, which I'll come to soon, but it is a commitment that throws a challenge to Labour and will delight those in his party who have been calling for increased defence spending for months in the face of growing global threats from Russia, China and Iran.

???? Listen above then tap here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts ???? In Electoral Dysfunction this week, we discuss whether Rishi Sunak, having been battered for much of his premiership, is finally having a week on top? There is after all a longstanding tradition in this country that when the chips are down, you jump on a plane to try to go somewhere where you're more appreciated. And Ruth agrees this week that this has been "one of the better weeks that he's had in his premiership" and is fully behind his defence spending pledge, while Jess points out that Labour is committed to the "exact same plan for upping defence spending".

The difference between the two parties is that Rishi Sunak set out in some detail how he plans to get to that point over the course of the next parliament, while Sir Keir Starmer has said only he wants to get to 2.5% "when resources allow". And that matters because, as it stands, it's very likely that it will be Sir Keir who is having to decide whether to increase defence spending levels in the next parliament rather than the incumbent.

Cue an election debate on which leader really cares more about defence and, if Sir Keir really does want go toe-to-toe with Mr Sunak on the 2.5%, how does he pay for it? That will be a discussion for many other days (Labour's line on this is that the party will hit the 2.5% "when circumstances allow" rather than setting a firm date) as we head into the general election. But I had to ask Ruth and Jess, why was he on a publicity blitz announcing it now? Was it something to do with the rather large matter of the local elections? 'Sunak needs to look big' At this, both furiously shook their heads and looked at me with a touch of derision.

"When it comes to the local elections, I want my bins done, I want my schools to be good, and I want my potholes done. That's what I care about," says Ruth.

"The people in Birmingham Yardley speak of nothing else but the 2.5% defence spending," jokes Jess. "I see why [he's doing it this week] but actually I don't think he's doing for just another example of doing it this week.

He needs to look big in front of his party." And there are a couple of things to explore in that. First, the party management issue of a PM very likely to get completely battered in the local elections throwing his party some red meat ahead of that slaughter to perhaps try to protect himself.

Because the local elections could be bad, very very bad. And that throws up questions about Rishi Sunak's future and also the date of the next general election.

There is a reason why the prime minister will not be drawn on the timing of the election beyond the "second half of the year". While it's true he doesn't want to have to "indulge in a guessing game.